Z Čech na Jadran a zpět

Z Čech na Jadran a zpět. Vznik topografie středo-evropského kulturního dědictví mezi říšským paradigmatem a národními okolnostmi (1900-1940), přednáška Daniela Barica

Místo: Ústav dějin umění AV ČR, Husova 4, Praha 1
Datum a čas: 22. května 2019
Organizátoři: CEFRES, ÚDU AV ČR

Daniel Baric

Daniel Baric studied History and completed German, Slavic and Hungarian studies in Paris, Berlin and Budapest. A former associate professor at the Department of German studies of Tours University, he is currently working at the Department of Slavic studies of Sorbonne University.
His researches focus on cultural transfers and interculturality in Central Europe, especially within the Habsburg Empire.

Abstrakt (EN)

To reflect upon the elaboration of patrimony policies and their endorsement by local actors means necessarily to take into account a wider context. The relationship of central imperial power with its Oriental circumferences is one of its major dimensions even more significant for the Austrian Empire.

There is a double aspect in Daniel Baric’s ongoing researches. They can be especially observed located among its geographical and historical boundaries. On the one hand, we can find a focus point on imperial Viennese institutions as they are considered to be an instrumental in the genesis of modern patrimony policies. On the other hand, there is a specific study revolving around the most peripheral provinces of Austria-Hungarian, Bosnia-Herzegovina and the Adriatic coast under Austria-Hungarian administration (1878–1918)

Our considerations will be concerned by the tremendous consequences due to the evanescence of the Austro-Hungarian Empire in the domains of embellishment policy and cataloging process.

Archeologists had indeed to find new ways of protecting patrimony through the implementation of new museums and university chairs (i.e. Carl Patsch in Sarajevo and then Vienna, Anton Gnirs in Pula and then at Loket). This process had been achieved by overcoming imperial structures that had collapsed in 1918.

Both of them were scholars born in Bohemia and trained in Prague. In accordance with their acknowledged expertise, they were sent to the Slavonic speaking provinces in the South of Austria-Hungary. They also both finished their researches once they went back to Bohemia and Austria.

The mainstream archeological researches were modified due to political changes and their own departure from their first fields of excavation. De facto, studies on romanization and imperial latinity that were so strongly developed in the Austria-Hungarian period were no more dominant. A new interest emerged for all things medieval and national, giving way to a new paradigm in archaeology.

The tight ties between biography and topography shall be addressed, in regard with current researches based on (mainly autobiographical) manuscripts due to be published.

Daniel Baric’s bibliography

Publications
1. Langue allemande, identité croate. Au fondement d’un particularisme culturel, Paris, Armand Colin, 2013. (Croatian translation : Zagreb, Leykam, 2015)

As an editor
2. Identités juives en Europe centrale, des Lumières à l’entre-deux-guerres, with Tristan Coignard and Gaëlle Vassogne, Tours, Presses universitaires François-Rabelais, 2014.

3. Archéologies méditerranéennes, Revue germanique internationale, 2012.

4. Mémoire et histoire en Europe centrale et orientale, with Jacques Le Rider and Drago Roksandić, Rennes, Presses universitaires de Rennes, 2010.

Teologie revoluce: Evropa od středověku po moderní dobu

Workshop

Datum:  20. a 21. května 2019
Místo:
Akademické konferenční centrum (Husova 4a, Praha 1) a Filozofická fakulta UK, sál 104 (nám. Jana Palacha 2, Praha 1)
Organizátor: Martin Pjecha (CEU/CEFRES)
Organizován ve spolupráci s: CEFRES, Centrum medievistických studií (CMS), Central European University (CEU)
Jazyk: angličtina

Hlavní hosté
  • Phillip Haberkern (Boston University) : When did Christians Become Revolutionary? A Reflection on Hannah Arendt
    FF UK, salle 104 (náměstí Jana Palacha 2, Prague 1)
  • Matthias Riedl (Central European University, Budapešť) : Apocalyptic Platonism: The Thought of Thomas Müntzer

CFP workshopu můžete vidět zde.

20th May 2019

 

10:00 – Introductory comments

10:30-12:00  Panel 1: Urban and noble rebellion in the 17th century

  • Rik Sowden (University of Birmingham): Religion and rebellion in Nottingham during the British Civil wars – (discussant: Vladimír Urbánek)
  • Márton Zászkaliczky (Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Institute for Literary Studies, Budapest): Calvinist Political Theology in the Bocskai Rebellion (1604-1606) – (discussant: Vladimír Urbánek)

12:00-13:00  Lunch

13:00-14:20 – Panel 2: 20th century interpretations

  • Behrang Pourhosseini (University Paris 8): From Christian Victimary Politics to Shi’ite Messianism : A Debate around the Iranian Revolution – (discussant: Thomas C. Mercier)
  • Giacomo Maria Arrigo (KU Leuwen/University of Calabria): Gnosticism and Revolution: Towards an Explanatory Pattern – (discussant: Matthias Riedl)

14:20-14:40  Coffee break

14:40-16:00  Panel 3: Imperial and Soviet Russia

  • Anastasia Papushina (CEU, Budapest): Martyrs and heroes: revisiting religious patterns in revolutionary times – (discussant: Hanuš Nykl)
  • Daniel García Augusto Porras (Universitat Ramon Llull (Barcelona)/Universidad Pontificia Comillas ):  Revolution as political religion in Russia: Dostoevsky’s Grand Inquisitor and its interpreters in Russian religious thought – (discussant: Hanuš Nykl)

16:00-16:20  Coffee break

16:30-18:00 – Keynote 1

  • Matthias Riedl (CEU, Budapest): Apocalyptic Platonism: The Thought of Thomas Müntzer

21st May 2019 

 

10:00-11:20  Panel 4: The French Revolution

  • Mathias Sonnleithner (MLU, Halle-Wittenberg) : Robespierre’s Belief to Be God’s Chosen – A Key Element of the Political Theology of the Terror – (discussant: Jakub Štofaník)
  • Amirpash Tavakkoli (EHESS, Paris) : French revolution, a Christian reading – (discussant: Jakub Štofaník)

11:20-11:50 – coffee break

11:50-13:10  Panel 5: Violence and bliss in medieval Bohemia

  • Pavlína Cermanová (CMS, Prague): The Theology of Hussite Innocence – (discussant: Phillip Haberkern)
  • Martin Pjecha (CEU, Budapest/CEFRES, Prague): “Cosmic” revolution in radical Hussitism – (discussant: Phillip Haberkern)

13:10-14:30  Lunch

14:30-16:30 – Panel 6: Intellectual transfers and comparisons in early modernity

  • Sam Gilchrist Hall (Károli Gáspár University of the Reformed Church in Hungary, Budapest): “But I do not doubt the people”: Thomas Müntzer and King Lear – (discussant: Matthias Riedl)
  • Luke Collison (Kingston University London): Hobbes and ‘Religion’ on the Threshold of Modernity – (discussant: Matthias Riedl)
  • Benjamin Heidenreich (University of Würzburg): Huldrich Zwingli´s influence on the “Peasants´ War” of 1525 – (discussant: Phillip Haberkern)

16:30-16:50 – Coffee break

17:30-19:00 – Keynote 2

  • Phillip Haberkern (Boston University): When did Christians Become Revolutionary? A Reflection on Hannah Arendt
    FF UK, salle 104 (náměstí Jana Palacha 2, Prague 1)

19:00  Closing remarks

 

Medicine, Value, and Knowledge Across the Species Line:  Contemporary U.S. Veterinary Medicine as Cultural Practice

Gellnerovský seminář

Přednáška Jane Desmond (University of Illinois) v rámci Gellnerovského semináře organizovaného Českou asociací pro sociální antropologii (CASA) spolu s Českou sociologickou společností  a ve spolupráci s Etnologickým ústavem AV ČR a CEFRES.

Kdy: 16. května 2019, 16:30
Kde: Etnologický ústav, konferenční místnost v 5. patře (Na Florenci 3, Praha 1)
Jazyk: angličtina

Abstrakt (EN)

Although the anthropological study of human medicine is a well developed field, research by anthropologists and sociologists on the structures and practice of medicine for animals around the world is a nascent field of inquiry.  Yet, whether caring for cherished pets or working to contain the spread of zoonoses, or monitoring a nation’s food supply, veterinarians play a central role in most countries.  In this presentation, based on preliminary fieldwork in two U.S. colleges of veterinary medicine, I map the relationships between client, patient, doctor, and technology, and the intersections of affect, species, money, scientific knowledge and cultural value when the patient is a dog… or a horse, or a cow, or even a snake. I conclude by raising questions about how the medical humanities and social sciences will have to expand to accommodate new notions of subjectivity, agency, narrativity, and ethnography in analyzing a more-than-human medicine.

Jane Desmond is Professor of Anthropology and of Gender and Women’s Studies, and Co-founder and Executive Director of the International Forum for U.S. Studies: a Center for the Transnational Study of the United States, at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, U.S.A.

Her primary areas of interest focus on issues of embodiment, display, and social identity, as well as transnational U.S. Studies. Her areas of expertise include performance studies, visual culture, the analysis of the U.S. in global perspectives, and the political economy of human/animal relations.  She is the Founding Resident Director of the international Summer Institute in Animal Studies at UIUC, and Founding Editor of the _Animal LIves_ Book Series at the University of Chicago Press.  In addition to academic publications, she has written about human-animal relations for a number of public venues such as CNN.com, The Washington Post.com, and the Huffington Post. The author or editor of five scholarly books,  she holds a Ph.D. in American Studies from Yale, and most recently published the monograph _Displaying Death and Animating Life:  Human-Animal Relations in Art, Science, and Everyday Life_ (University of Chicago Press, 2016).  Her current book project is called Medicine Across the Species Line:  Cultural Dimensions of Veterinary Medicine.

Transnational Governmentability

Deváté setkání epistemologického semináře organizovaného CEFRESem a Institutem mezinárodních studií FSV UK veden

Felipe K. Fernandes (EHESS / přidružený doktorand CEFRESu)
Transnational Governmentability

Místo: knihovna CEFRESu, Na Florenci 3, 110 00 Prague 1
Čas: středa 15. května 2019, od 16:30
Jazyk: angličtina

Textů:

  • J. Ferguson and A. Gupta, “Spatializing States : Toward an Ethnography of Neoliberal Governmentality”, American Ethnologist, vol. 29, n° 4, 2002, p. 981-1002.
  • Armelle Choplin, Olivier Pliez, “The Inconspicuous Spaces of Globalization”, Articulo – Journal of Urban Research, 12, 2015, p. 8–12.
    https://journals.openedition.org/articulo/2596⟩. ⟨halshs-01947925⟩

Jak se jidišští spisovatelé stali jidišskými spisovateli

Přednášku v rámci semináře o soudobých dějinách Židů organizovaného Ústavem pro soudobé dějiny AV ČR ve spolupráci s Masarykovým ústavem přednese Carmen Reichert (Augsburg University).

Místo: knihovna CEFRESu, Na Florenci 3, 110 00 Praha 1
Čas: 17:30-19:00
Jazyk: angličtina

Abstrakt

Volba jidiš v autobiografických spisech, období po I. L. Peretz
Nemělo by být překvapením, že autobiografie nám v literatuře v podstatě sdělují, jak se spisovatelé stávali spisovateli. Od Rousseauových Zpovědí ke Goethovým vzdělávajícím románům – číst a psát – je hlavním pramenem tohoto žánru seznam četby autorů a jejich první pokusy o psaní. Ale jidišští spisovatelé na začátku 20. století nevyrostli s vědomím, že jejich mateřský jazyk je i jejich jazyk literární . Pro židovské chlapce totiž byla hebrejština a nikoliv jidiš jazykem vzdělání v soukromých školách. To je důvod, proč se psaní jazykem jidiš na počátku 20. století vyvíjelo někde mezi tradičním hebrejsky vládnoucím vzdělávacím systémem Cheder a Ješiva a nežidovskými knihovnami. Podle tradice byly psané jidišské texty určeny především pro ženy a nevzdělané muže. Spisovatelé mužského a ženského pohlaví proto při psaní jidiš rozvíjeli různé psací strategie. Zatímco ženy se uchylovaly spíše k raným jidišských autobiografiím, jakou je třeba Glikla z Hamelnu “Zikhroynes” (Paměti), muži spíše sledovali západoevropské tradice.

V jidišských autobiografiích také můžeme často vidět, že autoři spojují svůj osobní život s dějinami jidiš. Příkladem může být třeba Sholem Aleichem, jenž porovnává svůj život s trhem (“yarid”) a současně se zavazuje k “jazykovému trhu” jidiš. I. L. Peretz, “otec” jidišské literatury, měl v tomto kontextu velmi významný vliv. Nejen, že povzbuzoval spisovatele, aby přešli do svého rodného jazyka, ale jeho autobiografie “Mayne zikhroynes” (Moje paměti) čerpající inspiraci z romantismu ovlivnila velké množství autobiografických textů od mladších autorů.

Carmen Reichert je postdoktorandka na Univerzitě v Augsburgu. V současné době pracuje na projektu věnující se literárním a jazykovým debatám v souvislosti s jazykovou konferencí v Černovicích (Ukrajina). Další informace naleznete zde.

Čeští a jihoafričtí komunisté

Gellnerovský seminář
Profesor Tom Lodge (University of Limerick) v rámci Gellnerovského semináře organizovaného Českou asociací pro sociální antropologii (CASA) spolu s Českou sociologickou společností  a ve spolupráci s Etnologickým ústavem AV ČR a CEFRES.

Kdy: 14. května 2019, 16:30
Kde: Ústavu české literatury, konferenční místnost (Na Florenci 3, Praha 1)
Jazyk: angličtina

Abstrakt (EN)

Documented Encounters between South African and Czech communists were sporadic and accidental in the early history of both Communist parties. Many years later the pioneering South African trade unionist, Ray Alexander, recalled meeting Klement Gottwald at a clandestine training school in her native Latvia shortly before her migration to Cape Town in 1930.  The Czech crisis of 1939 prompted the resignation of a senior personality in the South African party.  Young South African Communists visited Prague just after the Second World War and were later active in the Communist-affiliated international student movement based in the Czech capital.  The Czech government maintained a diplomatic presence in South Africa until 1962, the last communist administration to so and Czech officials were urged by South African communists to support trade sanctions.  By the 1960s contact between the “fraternal” parties was more institutionalized.  At this stage, the Czech army was beginning to supply training to Communist recruits in the insurgent force led by Nelson Mandela, Umkhonto we Sizwe.  The South Africa Communist Party, in exile from 1965, held a key party meeting hosted by Czech communists in Prague that year.  For the next two decades the South African Party would be locally represented in Prague on the editorial board of the World Marxist Review. The South African Communists were divided internally by the events of the Prague Spring though in public they professed their support for “normalization”.  This lecture will explore the background to these contacts and encounters.  The Czech “people’s democracy” of the 1950s was a key source of inspiration for the development of the South African notion of a “national democratic” revolution.  Czech support for this programme in the 1960s and 1970s was both a source of confidence and fragility, though.  The lecture will consider South African-Czech connections and linkages against the backdrop of the broader strategic concerns that informed and shaped Soviet and East European support for the South African liberatory politics.

Tom Lodge is a professor of Peace and Conflict Studies at the University of Limerick.

With a mother and father born respectively in Calcutta and Brno, Tom Lodge was educated in Nigeria, Borneo and Britain.  He has a D. Phil from York in Southern African Studies and he is a member of the Royal Irish Academy.  After working as a research assistant at the University of York’s Centre for Southern African Studies he began teaching in the Politics Department at the University of the Witwatersrand in Johannesburg in 1978. He remained at Wits University until 2005, leading its politics department through the 1990’s.  In 2005 he moved to the University of Limerick as Professor of Peace and Conflict Studies.  He visits South Africa two or three times a year and is a board member of the Electoral Institute, a Johannesburg-based NGO. He has published extensively on South African political history. His books include Nelson Mandela: A Critical Life (Oxford University Press, 2005) and Sharpeville: An Apartheid Massacre and its Consequences (Oxford University Press, 2017).  He has almost completed a book about the history of the South African Communist Party from its origins in the syndicalist politics of the white labour movement in South Africa in the 1900’s to its present-day development as a mass party.  He is about to begin a book commissioned by Routledge entitled “Political Corruption in Africa”.